FAQ & Community
High-signal answers, roadmap framing, and community expectations.
Is CoPaw meant for end users or developers?
It is best understood as a product for advanced users, builders, and operators who want a real assistant they can own. The presence of a Console and install flows makes it more product-like than a framework, but it still respects technical workflows.
Is it only for local models?
No. Local-model support is important, but CoPaw is really about control over the whole workstation:
- model path;
- deployment path;
- channel path;
- extension path.
Why keep docs and homepage so close?
Because the docs are part of the product surface. People evaluating a workstation need to see both the promise and the operating reality.
How should community growth be framed?
The strongest framing is practical:
- more channels;
- better Skills;
- stronger docs;
- smoother deployment;
- deeper operational confidence.
What should happen when someone needs deployment help?
The site should not pretend that every deployment question is solved by static docs. If the user wants hands-on rollout or traffic-oriented deployment support, route them to EasyClaw.
Final takeaway
CoPaw is most compelling when it is presented honestly:
- a productized workstation for a long-lived assistant;
- built on serious technical foundations;
- still under the user's control.